A TALE OF ANNOYING SCOUSERS

Contributed by Andy Regan   •   3rd March, 2001  •  57 views

Discuss 'A TALE OF ANNOYING SCOUSERS'  on our Forums


1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
A TALE OF ANNOYING SCOUSERS thumbnail

Andy Regan examines the bitter attitude displayed by supporters from the red half of Merseyside since their team’s fall from grace.

Many years ago, or so it seems, another seemingly unbeatable team in red emerged from the North West. For almost two decades Liverpool were clearly the (big gulp) Manchester United of their times.

The Scousers were, I suspect, reasonably well thought of by many Chelsea fans. Let’s face it, we weren’t challenging for the same trophies. Their sights were often set on Gullit’s “cup with the big ears”. Ours were set on the Full Members. They were also popular for playing amazing football except, strangely, when they visited the Bridge - Rhodes-Brown and co were clearly too much for them. Also, they were not London rivals.

Their fans were also known, sometimes inaccurately, for their appreciation of other teams playing well. Perhaps the Kop just used to be patronising? Whatever the reasons, there was nothing like the intense arrogance associated with the Mancs in recent years.

However, the point of this article is to question this assumption. I actually get the impression that many Man U supporters are getting bored with their dominance - this and last season have been something of a procession in the Premier League.

And Liverpool fans? Probably the most arrogant and spiteful towards the Chelsea resurgence in the land. They really do seem to claim a divine right to being the best team around. Now don’t get me wrong. All fans are jealous of other teams’ success. That’s expected.

But to start with, a recent article assessed the least liked clubs in the land, as voted for by a fanzine editor from each Premiership club. I quote the Liverpool ‘expert’, pontificating on Chelsea’s recent managerial change: “They have serious delusions of grandeur. Vialli wins five trophies in three years yet gets sacked because apparently that’s not good enough for Chelsea. Since when?”

What a terrible crime! For a Club to want their team to do better, to be more successful. And to cap it all, when the replica trophies at Anfield must be starting to amass a tonne of cobwebs.

After the Cup win of 1997, when all other footy fans I knew at least managed a grudging “well done”, a red Scouser in a huff at work on the Monday growled as he went past: “You won’t win anything else”. End of conversation.

Another Liverpool fan I know unleashed a torrent of abuse at the club. After the Reds got stuffed at the Bridge once again? No, after getting a ticket among the Barcelona fans at the Bridge last season. And that after perhaps our finest ever night of football.

A few weeks ago Liverpool fans were asked on national radio whether Fowler should leave. “Let him go and play Nationwide football next season,” one replied with glee, “‘cos Chelsea will be.”

I know too many other Chelsea fans who have had run-ins with graceless Scousers over recent years for it to be a coincidence. But why the bias? As if winning more trophies than them in the past four years is not enough, my mind goes back to one Sunday early in 1997. An FA Cup classic, for us anyway. That victory, more than any other, pointed the way to the next few years. They were top of the league at the time - it’s us who have won the silverware since.

We will take the trophies any day and the jealousy that goes with it. Are their fortunes changing? They may win the Worthless this year but then they will probably get even more annoying.

Social Bookmarks: Facebook - del.icio.us - Digg - reddit - StumbleUpon

Sponsors

CFCnet Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up for travel and other related information.

(required)
(required)
 

Buy the Magazine

From the Forum - Latest Topics

From the Forum - Independent Travel

Highest Rated Articles

Most Popular Topics


CFCnet now offers a feature-rich, intelligent and moderated forum for our readers to share their own personal views on all things Chelsea FC related. Our agenda is simply to reflect the diversity of their opinions. We are not politically motivated at all. CFCnet does not actively canvass media outlets but if asked to put forward our views on a topic, we will. Any views put forward will take into account CFCnet readers' comments on our various forums although it is impossible to put across all views on any given topic due to diversity of opinion. CFCnet also represents CFCnet readers at the Chelsea Fans Forum and we do our best to put forward the majority viewpoint and we will do our best to pass on messages to the right person within the club if so requested.


We are not affiliated to any other Chelsea FC related fan's websites or organisations.


The views and opinions on this website in no way represent the views of Chelsea Football Club. The views and opinions on these pages are not necessarily those of CFCnet and are usually attributed to the contributor. (We reserve the right to edit any material, or to exclude anything considered racist, sexist or overly offensive.) All opinion broadcast on media outlets should be attributed to the person being interviewed, not as a representative of other Chelsea supporters.


The official Chelsea FC website can be found on http://www.chelseafc.co.uk.


Media and Editorial contacts are London based.


RIP Peter Osgood - 1947 - 2006   •  Designed by InType Media

All text © 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 Except where stated - CFCnet version 5.0 (Jan 2008)

Images © PA Photos/Darren Walsh and CFCnet

Log In | Terms and Conditions | TOP