JOSE FOR ENGLAND? OH, THE HYPOCRISY

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
Contributed by Grahame Fendle   •   10th December, 2007  •  105 views

Discuss 'JOSE FOR ENGLAND? OH, THE HYPOCRISY'  on our Forums

JOSE FOR ENGLAND? OH, THE HYPOCRISY thumbnail

I’ve not been able to keep up with football news much in recent weeks; I’ve had to be content with snippets from NewsNow and the occasionally dip into the CFCnet forums, so it was with some alarm that I read there seems to be a groundswell of support for Jose Mourinho to take over the vacant England manager’s slot. Really? Seriously? In those immortal words; I don’t bloody believe it!

As if that weren’t bad enough in itself, I note with some interest that The Sun, Britain’s favourite newspaper, is leading the charge for Jose to be appointed for what is clearly one of the most thankless tasks in international football. It even went as far as projecting a massive image of Jose on to the Soho Square building, just in case the blue-blazered old duffers at the FA needed a clue.

Personally, I find it amazing that even The Sun has the temerity to go to such extremes in backing a manager whose previous team turned in, by their own words, performances that were described as turgid. Sometimes you just couldn’t make it up. Have these people no shame at all? Of course they don’t, otherwise they’d be embarrassed by what is a clear hatred of all things Chelsea throughout the Fourth Estate.

However, what I find most intriguing is the clear stupidity of the hundreds of football fans queuing up to back Jose Mourinho on any one of the radio phone-ins we tune in to every day. Are these the same people who complained constantly about the style of football played by Chelsea? The very same people who claim that actually it does matter how you win, not just that you do? Of course it is, there are enough of them on this site who moaned about the way Chelsea played under Jose. They’re still doing it now.

I can see it now. Three games into Jose’s tenure and England have won all three games, or maybe drawn one along the way. People won’t be happy, and The Sun won’t be happy, because although England will be getting the results they think they deserve - all off the back of a World Cup win in 1966 of course - they won’t be doing it in the style that people really want to see. Fundamentally there’s a point being missed here: what the hell is wrong with the England international team’s defence? Nothing that I can see, nothing at all in fact. The one thing the England team is not short of is decent defenders, and it hasn’t been for a very long time. So, just so I’m clear on this: The Sun says that over half the football supporters in this country want Jose as the new England manager? Why? Oh wait, I know, because he’s a winner.

History repeats itself, we know this. The CFCnet forums are a living testimony to the fact that although people like to see a winning team, they don’t like to see a team winning without having the fans reaching for the man-size tissues when they make a mess after Frank Lampard spanks one in from 30 yards. They don’t like close games either. What they want is to see teams batter opposition by a handful of goals to nil. Under Jose, England will never do that. Not ever. It’s completely and utterly not the Mourinho way. The fans will enjoy the wins for a while, then the “I wish we played a bit more like Brazil/Italy/France” comments will start to appear on internet forums and blogs, and The Sun will be playing its part in all this; the campaigns for entertaining football will be across the back pages, with the same 66% of people backing the campaign who voted lemming-like for Jose in the first place.

My advice to the FA is simple: take a few hours to look around CFCnet and you’ll realise what a mistake signing Jose Mourinho would be. You have been warned.

Social Bookmarks: Facebook - del.icio.us - Digg - reddit - StumbleUpon

Sponsors

CFCnet Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up for travel and other related information.

(required)
(required)
 

RELATED ARTICLES

Most Popular Topics

From the Forum - Latest Topics


CFCnet now offers a feature-rich, intelligent and moderated forum for our readers to share their own personal views on all things Chelsea FC related. Our agenda is simply to reflect the diversity of their opinions. We are not politically motivated at all. CFCnet does not actively canvass media outlets but if asked to put forward our views on a topic, we will. Any views put forward will take into account CFCnet readers' comments on our various forums although it is impossible to put across all views on any given topic due to diversity of opinion. CFCnet also represents CFCnet readers at the Chelsea Fans Forum and we do our best to put forward the majority viewpoint and we will do our best to pass on messages to the right person within the club if so requested.


We are not affiliated to any other Chelsea FC related fan's websites or organisations.


The views and opinions on this website in no way represent the views of Chelsea Football Club. The views and opinions on these pages are not necessarily those of CFCnet and are usually attributed to the contributor. (We reserve the right to edit any material, or to exclude anything considered racist, sexist or overly offensive.) All opinion broadcast on media outlets should be attributed to the person being interviewed, not as a representative of other Chelsea supporters.


The official Chelsea FC website can be found on http://www.chelseafc.co.uk.


Media and Editorial contacts are London based.


RIP Peter Osgood - 1947 - 2006   •  Designed by InType Media

All text © 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 Except where stated - CFCnet version 5.0 (Jan 2008)

Images © PA Photos/Darren Walsh and CFCnet

Log In | Terms and Conditions | TOP