
Ryan Betrand in action against QPR
If ever there were a finger to be pointed at fault for defeat at home to Queens Park Rangers on Wednesday evening, then there would be no more likely candidate than Rafa Benitez.
Though a thoughtless and knee jerk reaction of the above summary maybe found, the blame falls on the Spaniard’s lap for failing to win a match that was presented as a victory throughout the game prior to Shaun Wright-Phillips eventual winner.
Rightly so, Benitez found the London derby against bottom of the table to QPR an excuse to rotate the starting line-up and refresh the squad. Those decisions have to be defended even in defeat, as the starting line-up were adequate to beat a team stranded in such isolation in the league having not won an away match since 2011 and conceding in 27 consecutive matches.
It wasn’t the selection that thwarted the attacking ebb of the team but the tactics and strategies employed by both sides. With Rangers setting up to shut out Chelsea and effectively doing so, there was a suggestion by half time a goal may have to be forced by tactical adjustment in a tight game.
Benitez’s reluctance to really make dependable changes or even influence the game from the technical area are held as the primary reasons for the short falling on Wednesday. With QPR tight knitted and compact in two lines of defence, they showed a willingness to allow Chelsea to keep possession and continue to casually distribute the passes around without promising much goal threat, with the exception of speculatively wild long range efforts from Ivanovic and Luiz and a deflected chance in the first half.
Support was certainly needed further up the field to contend with bodies flooding the key attacking areas protected by QPR, as they persisted with exclusive pressing in their own territory, allowing their wingers to peg Chelsea’s fullbacks and the trio in midfield to close down the space of Oscar, Moses and Marin.
Resurgence in attack from the Blues was shortcoming soon after the second half after an initial burst of penetration was roundly quashed with the juggernaut defence from the opposition. Leadership was certainly needed from a manager who surely needed to win this type of matche to prove to the footballing world he can still cut it.

Ivanovic in action against QPR
It seemed to take a while before Ivanovic found encouragement to move forward with or without the ball and not under the prerequisite of set pieces. And even after QPR scored a centre back were never sent up front to make a nuisance of himself and support a whimpering forlorn Fernando Torres, who was far too frequently shrugged off the ball with ease from the aging defensive partnership of Hill and Nelsen.
Instead of making an attacking change or pushing one of the holding midfielders further forward when 11 QPR shirts would swamp their own half, or even make a 3 man defence to cater for the wedging of another player in the heart of rangers’ defence, Benitez opted for straightforward replacements. Once falling behind, a change in personnel consisted of a swap of Ramires for Lampard, even though Chelsea by that stage were chasing the game to rescue a point and had created little apart from the latters disallowed goal for offside.
It has been mentioned by commentators in the past of how Rafa Benitez likes to think about changes around the hour mark, which shouldn’t be thought as a surprise when the Spaniard decided to replace the slightly disappointing Marko Marin, making his first league start, with Eden Hazard.
But then his decision to make that change there and then says much about his predictability than his supposed masterful tactical awareness. And that is why defeat was a hard pill to swallow on Wednesday evening, and one to be taken with a glass of water by Rafa Benitez come the summer.
Shortlink:
We’ve had umpteen managers over the last ten years and still won more than Manure in that time. This tends to suggest that managers and their decisions are not as important as we like to believe. The players are the only ones to be able to directly affect a result. If we fail, it’s largely their fault… not that of the scapegoat in the dugout. Do you think Benitez tells Torres to play like a surly shit?
I agree with CarefreeTay
Just because the writer of the article does not like Benitez doesn’t mean it should color his articles so obviously. I wouldn’t say i was overly optimistic when i saw the team without Mata, but Mata cannot play every game. We cannot be accused of putting out an understrength team just because he is not in it. If anything the team needs to learn to play without him. If there was one thing i would criticise Matteo for was that he did not experiment with different options behind Torres. Instead of us now being completely dependent on him for creativity.
Rafa absolutely should not receive any stick for this game. It’s not like he played reserves and kids. These are players who all play regularly, aside from Marin, and are top players. Besides, Marin probably wasn’t even a risk considering how poor hazard has been. Mata was the only player we missed, but we stated Oscar in his spot, who is an equally brilliant player. We played our full strength team, minus Cole and Mata. Rafa has done fantastically well. Taraabt and granero again exposed how lampard offers nothing besides popping up with a goal here and there. Luiz was alone in defending against 4 qpr players.
You are blaming Rafa because you dont like him, if that starting line up can not beat QPR then the team is overrated, did you ever blame Roberto d” Matheo anytime he lost. BALLSS!!!
its simple we never wanted them #rafaout #torresout